超语言学与系统功能语言学:相容还是分离
摘 要:针对巴赫金超语言学与韩礼德系统功能语言学是高度相容还是根本不同这一问题,本文在对它们进行更加系统深入的比较后发现,二者在研究范式、语境的社会符号学构成以及语言功能观这三个关键方面高度相容;它们实际上与索绪尔结构语言学以及后结构主义文论在某种意义上构成了一个理论的'渐变体“;系统功能语言学和超语言学相互借鉴可以起到有效沟通语言学与文学批评这两大领域的桥梁作用。
关键词:超语言学; 系统功能语言学; 融合性; 沟通
Abstract:Addressing the controversial issue as to whether or not the Bakhtinian Translinguistics is compatible with the Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL),this paper makes a relatively more thorough comparison between these two theories of language\|in\|use,and finds that they are highly compatible with each other concerning the three key issues of research paradigm,the social\|semiotic configuration of context and the functional conceptualization of language,and that they actually work together with Saussurean structural linguistics and theories of poststructural literary criticism to form a cline of theories as far as the stability of textual meaning is concerned.This finding leads to a proposal that a good combination of Translinguistics and SFL can effectively bridge the gap between the field of linguistics and that of literary criticism.
Key Words:Translinguistics; SFL; compatibility; bridging
中图分类号:H0 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1004-6038(2008)04-0017-04
1.引言
超语言学因其将实际使用的语篇作为研究对象从而自然被认为同当今以语篇分析为旨趣的语言学理论有着很多相通之处,其中韩礼德的系统功能语言学更是被认为与之有着很多契合之处,持这一观点的大多为从事语篇分析以及文体学研究的学者,如弗罗(Frow,1980)、怀特(White,1984)、弗勒(Fowler,1996)以及胡壮麟(1994)等。然而,以鲁特兰德(Rutland,1990)和贝克(Bek,1999)等为代表的研究者认为,尽管超语言学是针对索绪尔结构语言...
== 试读已结束,如需继续阅读敬请充值会员 ==
|
本站文章均为原创投稿,仅供下载参考,付费用户可查看完整且有格式内容!
(费用标准:38元/2月,98元/2年,微信支付秒开通!) |
升级为会员即可查阅全文 。如需要查阅全文,请 免费注册 或 登录会员 |