您当前的位置:首页 >  述职报告 >  述职报告模版 > 内容

高黏度与低黏度骨水泥PVP治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的效果分析

材料写作网    时间: 2021-12-23 04:06:47     阅读:

[摘要] 目的 分析高黏度骨水泥PVP与低黏度骨水泥PVP治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的临床效果。 方法 将2016年3月15日~2017年11月15日在本院接受PVP治疗的34例骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折患者作为研究对象,电脑随机编码分成对照组(低黏度骨水泥)、观察组(高黏度骨水泥),每组17例。对比两组的各项得分与术后并发症。 结果 观察组手术之后脊柱功能障碍得分(11.36±3.32)分、腰痛程度得分(2.25±0.10)分、骨水泥渗漏、肺栓塞、临近椎体骨折发生率均比对照组要低(P<0.05)。 结论 高黏度骨水泥PVP比低黏度骨水泥PVP治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折更加安全有效。

[关键词] 骨水泥;高黏度;低黏度;PVP;骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折

[中图分类号] R687.3 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)13-0062-03

Effect of high viscosity and low viscosity cement PVP in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

XU Jun

Department of Orthopedics, Chinese People"s Liberation Army No.171 Hospital, Jiujiang 332800, China

[Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical effect of high viscosity cement PVP and low viscosity cement PVP on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods 34 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with PVP in our hospital from March 15th, 2016 to November 15th, 2017 were selected and randomly divided into control group(low viscosity cement) and observation group(high viscosity cement), with 17 cases in each group. The scores and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared. Results The spine dysfunction score(11.36±3.32 points) and lumbago score(2.25±0.10 points), the incidence of bone cement leakage, pulmonary embolism, vertebral fractures was lower than the that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion PVP with high viscosity is more effective and safer than PVP with low viscosity in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression frac...

== 试读已结束,如需继续阅读敬请充值会员 ==
本站文章均为原创投稿,仅供下载参考,付费用户可查看完整且有格式内容!
(费用标准:38元/2月,98元/2年,微信支付秒开通!)
升级为会员即可查阅全文 。如需要查阅全文,请 免费注册登录会员
《高黏度与低黏度骨水泥PVP治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的效果分析.doc》
将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便收藏和打印
推荐度:

文档为doc格式

相关热搜

《高黏度与低黏度骨水泥PVP治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的效果分析.doc》

VIP请直接点击按钮下载本文的Word文档下载到电脑,请使用最新版的WORD和WPS软件打开,如发现文档不全可以联系客服申请处理。

文档下载
VIP免费下载文档

浏览记录