可口可乐与汇源集中案之解析
［摘 要］ 商务部做出了否决可口可乐与汇源集中申请的裁决，但是，商务部并没有公布其理由及过程。这一举动引起了诸多质疑，严重影响了商务部裁决的合理性。运用反垄断法知识对商务部的裁决进行解释，探明其真实意图具有重大实际意义！同时，以该案作为具体分析对象，阐明我国反垄断法的知识形态应以法律解释为主导路径的实际价值，并通过法律解释与适用的过程来促进反垄断法知识的增长。
［关键词］ 支配地位；传导；中小企业竞争；进入壁垒；潜在竞争
［中图分类号］D922.29［文献标识码］Ａ ［文章编号］1008”1763(2011)03”0145”05
The Analysis of Coca-Cola/Huiyuan Concentration
ZENG Jing
(Law School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)
Abstract:The Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China has made the decision to block the Coca Cola/Huiyuan concentration. However, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China has not published the reasons and process of the decision. So, it has caused a lot of questions, and seriously affected the rationality of the decision. Therefore, there is a great practical significance for applying the knowledge of the anti monopoly law to explain the decision, and proving the true intention of the ministry of commerce of the people’s republic of China on Coca Cola/Huiyuan concentration. Moreover, the concrete analysis of this case also illustratesChina’s anti monopoly law should adopt the approach of the legal interpretation. At the same time, their knowledge would be increased in the process of interpreting and applyingChina’s anti monopoly law.
Key words: dominant position;conduction;the competition of Small and Medium sized Enterprises;barriers to entry;potential competition
一 问题的提出
2009年3月，商务部否决了可口可乐公司与汇源果汁有限公司的集中申请，这是我国反...
|
== 试读已结束，如需继续阅读敬请充值会员 ==
|
|
本站文章均为原创投稿，仅供下载参考，付费用户可查看完整且有格式内容！
(费用标准：38元/2月，98元/2年，微信支付秒开通！) |
| 升级为会员即可查阅全文 。如需要查阅全文，请 免费注册 或 登录会员 |
|
