腰大池引流在自发性小脑出血并破入脑室患者中的应用
[摘要] 目的 探讨腰大池引流在自发性小脑出血并破入脑室患者中的应用效果。 方法 选取我院2010年1月～2016年3月收治的90例自发性小脑出血破入脑室患者进行研究，按随机数字表法将其分为研究组和对照组，对照组采用颅内血肿微创清除术治疗，研究组在此基础上增加腰大池引流，治疗结束后比较两组患者近期、远期疗效及感染情况。 结果 研究组近期疗效优于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（Uc=2.035>u，P<0.05）。研究组远期疗效优于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（Uc=2.014>u，P<0.05）。治疗期间无严重感染病例发生，两组患者共发生发热症状者21例，其中研究组12例（26.67%），对照组9例（20.00%），经脑脊液培养均证实为阴性，发热症状发生率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.559，P>0.05）。 结论 在颅内血肿微创清除术的基础上增加腰大池引流治疗，可改善小脑出血并破入脑室治疗效果，生存质量较好。
[关键词] 小脑出血；腰大池引流；颅内血肿清除术；脑室
[中图分类号] R651.1 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701（2017）15-0046-03
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical effects of lumbar cistern drainage in patients with cerebellar hemorrhage and broken into ventricle. Methods 90 cases of patients with cerebellar hemorrhage and broken into ventricle in our hospital from January 2010 to March 2016 were chosen to research，and were divided into research group and control group，control group were treated with minimally invasive surgery for intracranial hematoma，research group were treated withlumbar cistern drainage on the basis of control group，short-term efficacy， long-term efficacy and infection between two group were compared. Results Short-term efficacy of research group were better than that of control group，the difference was statistically significant （Uc=2.035>u，P<0.05）. Long-term efficacy of research group were better than that of control group，the difference was statistically significant （Uc=2.014>u，P<0.05）. No serious infection occurred during the treatmen...
|
== 试读已结束，如需继续阅读敬请充值会员 ==
|
|
本站文章均为原创投稿，仅供下载参考，付费用户可查看完整且有格式内容！
(费用标准：38元/2月，98元/2年，微信支付秒开通！) |
| 升级为会员即可查阅全文 。如需要查阅全文，请 免费注册 或 登录会员 |
|
