FRD特殊染色技术与液基细胞学检查在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用对比
打开文本图片集
[摘要]目的 比较FRD和TCT检查在宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值。方法 采取自身对照法，选取2015年4月～2018年1月我院妇科门诊的2500例患者，均行FRD和TCT检查，FRD或（和）TCT结果阳性，再行阴道镜检查并取宫颈组织活检，以活检结果为金标准，评价FRD和TCT筛查的阳性检出率及FRD和TCT的诊断价值。以灵敏度、特异性、误诊率、漏诊率、阳性预测率、阴性预测率为诊断价值指标。结果 2500例患者中，FRD和TCT的阳性检出率分别为10.32% 和9.96%，两者比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。FRD和TCT的灵敏度、特异性、误诊率、漏诊率、阳性预测率及阴性预测比较，差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 FRD和TCT对宫颈癌前病变筛查均具检出效能，診断价值相当。
[关键词]宫颈癌前病变;筛查;叶酸受体介导的宫颈特殊染色;液基薄层细胞学检测
[中图分类号] R737.33 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721（2019）6（c）-0031-04
[Abstract] Objective To compare the application value of folate receptor-mediated detection （FRD） and thin-prep cytology test （TCT） in cervical cancer screening. Methods By self-control method， from April 2015 to January 2018， 2500 patients in the gynaecological clinic of our hospital performed with FRD and TCT examinations were selected. When the FRD or/and TCT outcomes were positive， the cervical biopsy under colposcope was performed. The biopsy result was set as the golden standard. The positive detection rate of FRD and TCT screening and the diagnostic values of FRD and TCT were evaluated， the parameters were sensitivity， specificity， misdiagnosis rate， missed diagnosis rate， positive predictive rate， and negative predictive rate. Results Among 2500 patients， the positive detection rates of FRD and TCT were 10.32% and 9.96%， respectively， there was ...
|
== 试读已结束，如需继续阅读敬请充值会员 ==
|
|
本站文章均为原创投稿，仅供下载参考，付费用户可查看完整且有格式内容！
(费用标准：38元/2月，98元/2年，微信支付秒开通！) |
| 升级为会员即可查阅全文 。如需要查阅全文，请 免费注册 或 登录会员 |
|
