临床护理路径在消化性溃疡患者中的应用
[摘要]目的 研究对消化性溃疡患者在治疗期间采用临床护理路径（CNP）实施护理的应用效果。方法 选取2016年6月～2017 年5月我院收治的消化性溃疡患者86例作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法将其将其分为对照组、试验组，每组43例。对照组患者在治疗期间采用常规护理，试验组患者在治疗期间采用CNP模式进行护理，比较两组的治疗效果、护理满意度、患者对疾病知识的掌握程度、住院天数、住院费用。结果 两组患者的治疗效果比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。试验组的护理总满意度高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组患者的消化性溃疡相关知识掌握度平均得分为（8.7±1.2）分，高于对照组的（7.9±1.1）分，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组患者的平均住院时间短于对照组，平均住院总费用低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 对消化性溃疡患者在治疗期间采用CNP进行护理，能有效提高护理满意度，缩短住院时间和降低住院费用，值得在临床应用中推广。
[关键词]临床护理路径；消化性溃疡；护理；治疗
[中图分类号] R473.72 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721（2018）7（a）-0177-04
[Abstract]Objective To study the application effect of clinical nursing pathway （CNP） in patients with peptic ulcer.Methods Eighty patients with peptic ulcer admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to May 2017 were selected as the research object，and were divided into control group and experimental group with 43 cases in each group by random number table method.Patients in the control group were given routine nursing during the treatment while patients in the experimental group were given clinical nursing path mode during the treatment. The nursing satisfaction，patients"mastery of disease knowledge，hospitalization days，hospitalization expenses and treatment effect of the two groups were compared.Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups （P>0.05）.The total satisfaction degree of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group， ...
|
== 试读已结束，如需继续阅读敬请充值会员 ==
|
|
本站文章均为原创投稿，仅供下载参考，付费用户可查看完整且有格式内容！
(费用标准：38元/2月，98元/2年，微信支付秒开通！) |
| 升级为会员即可查阅全文 。如需要查阅全文，请 免费注册 或 登录会员 |
|
